Friday 19 January 2018

Nikki Haley threatens to “take names” at the UN ahead of Jerusalem vote

As a rare General Assembly emergency session approaches, Haley warns countries that Trump will be watching

In a threat to the United Nations General Assembly, the U.S. ambassador to the international body, Nikki Haley, forewarned that the U.S. “will be taking names” ahead of a vote this week to condemn President Donald Trump’s unilateral decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and pressure him to rescind his declaration.

“At the UN we’re always asked to do more & give more,” Haley tweeted on Tuesday afternoon. “So, when we make a decision, at the will of the American ppl, abt where to locate OUR embassy, we don’t expect those we’ve helped to target us. On Thurs there’ll be a vote criticizing our choice. The US will be taking names.”

At the UN we’re always asked to do more & give more. So, when we make a decision, at the will of the American ppl, abt where to locate OUR embassy, we don’t expect those we’ve helped to target us. On Thurs there’ll be a vote criticizing our choice. The US will be taking names.

Haley’s mafia-style threat comes as the General Assembly is expected to hold an emergency session on Thursday where a vote will be held on a resolution to oppose the Trump administration’s recent Jerusalem decision, according to Reuters. The world has by and large criticized Trump’s decision and has warned that it has tarnished hopes of achieving a peaceful solution.

Haley also wrote that the U.S. will remember the countries that publicly dare to criticize the country, in a letter to dozens of U.N. states.

“The president will be watching this vote carefully and has requested I report back on those countries who voted against us. We will take note of each and every vote on this issue,” Haley wrote.

The call for a rare emergency session comes after the U.S. vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution on Monday that would have made Washington rescind the highly controversial move. All 14 other council members, including longtime close U.S. allies, voted against the U.S.

Thursday’s vote by the General Assembly would be not be legally binding, meaning the vote would serve as an expression of disapproval, which certainly still holds some political clout.

But Haley doesn’t seem to recognize that her tactics are putting the nation down a lonely path and places it at odds with many traditional U.S. allies. Much like the president, she continues to grandstand or perform political theater in order to shield the U.S. from wrongdoing and position itself as the victim.

Trump has, however, refused to back down from his proclamation and has instead insisted that it will help with a peace process, despite widespread agreement that it only weakens peaceful solutions.

In the end, Haley’s threats only ring hollow as they further isolate the U.S. and simply come off as tone deaf, short-sighted and immature.

Someone should inform Haley, who is supposed to act as a diplomat and not a Trump sycophant, that the votes are public record, so she won’t need to take any names. Plenty of others quickly took notice of how harmful Haley’s publicity stunts can be for the U.S. and the world order.

Reza Aslan

Is Nikki Haley really so dumb as to think that this whole “we’re taking names” bullshit is suppose to scare the security council? …

5:16 AM – Dec 20, 2017
449 449 Replies 900 900 Retweets 3,216 3,216 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

Paul Dickinson
Actual letter from the US’ UN ambassador Nikki Haley. This last paragraph is written like a fifth grade threat of someone taking names to report to teacher. It’s a f’ing joke and an embarrassment to our country.

6:49 AM – Dec 20, 2017
29 29 Replies 54 54 Retweets 131 131 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Nikki Haley

At the UN we’re always asked to do more & give more. So, when we make a decision, at the will of the American ppl, abt where to locate OUR embassy, we don’t expect those we’ve helped to target us. On Thurs there’ll be a vote criticizing our choice. The US will be taking names.

Mikel Jollett

It’s almost like Western imperialists have no idea what the repercussions of their clumsy, selfish, amoral actions will be.

12:45 AM – Dec 20, 2017
166 166 likes 30 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Daniel Baer

This is a dumb thing to say, Amb @nikkihaley.

Our influence in diplomacy comes from our ability to speak to universal values and aspirations— mafia-boss threats are the crude tool of autocrats. …

2:18 AM – Dec 20, 2017
35 35 Replies 227 227 Retweets 743 743 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Raphael Ahren

By threatening to “take names” of countries opposing the US recognition of Jerusalem the General Assembly, @nikkihaley has declared Thursday’s vote a referendum on the administration’s global credibility. Good luck with that.

My guess: 171 in favor, 7 against, 9 abstentions.

7:47 AM – Dec 20, 2017
12 12 Replies 48 48 Retweets 59 59 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Report Advertisement
ACLU sues a Louisiana district over school prayer, enforced religion

Scott Reiss
The Bible references unicorns at least six times, and has some references to dragons as well. Your link leads to a translation of the Bible that refers to “oxen” with two horns, not unicorns. Most of the so-called dragon references are pretty vague. Behemoth & Leviathan are usually translated as proper nouns, although Hebrew has no uppercase letters that could indicate this. Your scholarship is as usual pretty weak.
Public radio’s #MeToo problem: Harassment claims cloud NYC’s flagship station

sadie holly
comrade, how can you repeat blatant lies when so many of us women know very well about wage discrimination, have lived with wage discrimination. time after time companies would tell you not to talk about your pay because when you did you found that you, the woman was being paid less than the guy you are working with, heck sometimes I found I earned less than the guys working for me and had to threaten to leave to get a raise and could I always do that? no I could not. When I started working, they were pretty open about women earning less than men and it was not illegal. That was the way it was and if you didn’t want the job, you could leave, so your choice was to be paid less or not at all,. The worst example was a woman who worked hard at her job, her husband left her with 4 small kids and she needed this job to support them while there was a 20 year old boy who was a goof off who lived with his parents. He wa paid almost twice as much as she was and when I asked the boss why they said it was because men had to support families. Not exactly correct in this particular example. There are many examples of people in bad jobs who can’t leave them because they really need to earn something, Both men and women get stuck in jobs that pay too little or are too dangerous or endanger their health because that is all they can get.
Sorry, NRA: The U.S. was actually founded on gun control

Until you figure out how to keep guns out of criminals hands, the rest of us will always be allowed to defend ourselves. It’s never going to change.

Did You Know?
In 2000, Trump ran for President under the Reform Party, actually winning the California and Michigan primaries before dropping out.
Did You Know?
In September 2014, Donald Trump offered Barack Obama free golf for life at his many courses via Twitter with one condition: he would have to resign as POTUS.
Did You Know?
To teach him discipline, Donald Trump’s parents sent him to the NY Military Academy when he was 13, from which he graduated in 1964.
Did You Know?
Despite his business in casinos and hotels, Donald Trump completely abstains from drinking alcohol and cites his brother, who suffered from alcoholism, as the reason.
Did You Know?
When guest starring on “Late Night with Conan O’Brien,” Donald Trump claimed that he has never used an ATM before.